Back to Blog

Lab Guide: Benchmarking Any AI Video Tool with VMAF & SSIM Using Netflix Open Content

Lab Guide: Benchmarking Any AI Video Tool with VMAF & SSIM Using Netflix Open Content

Introduction

As AI video generation tools like Midjourney Video, Runway Gen-3, and Google Veo 3 flood the market, content creators and streaming platforms face a critical challenge: how do you objectively measure which tool delivers the best quality? (AI-Powered Video Editing Trends in 2025) Traditional subjective evaluation falls short when comparing dozens of AI models, making standardized metrics like VMAF (Video Multi-Method Assessment Fusion) and SSIM (Structural Similarity Index) essential for data-driven decisions.

This comprehensive lab guide walks you through building a complete benchmarking pipeline using FFmpeg with libvmaf, Netflix's open content dataset, and FFMetrics visualization. (Deep Render: An AI Codec That Encodes in FFmpeg, Plays in VLC, and Outperforms SVT-AV1) Whether you're evaluating AI upscaling tools, comparing codec performance, or validating preprocessing engines like Sima Labs' SimaBit, this methodology provides the scientific rigor needed for professional video workflows.

Why VMAF and SSIM Matter for AI Video Evaluation

The Limitations of Subjective Testing

While human perception remains the gold standard for video quality assessment, subjective testing becomes impractical when evaluating multiple AI video tools across diverse content types. (How AI is Transforming Video Quality) Modern AI video enhancement relies on deep learning models trained on large video datasets to recognize patterns and textures, making their output highly variable depending on content characteristics.

VMAF: Netflix's Perceptual Quality Metric

VMAF combines multiple elementary metrics (PSNR, SSIM, MS-SSIM) with machine learning to predict human perception scores. (Sima Labs) Developed by Netflix and validated against thousands of subjective tests, VMAF scores correlate strongly with Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) across diverse content types and viewing conditions.

Key VMAF advantages:

  • Trained on Netflix's massive subjective database

  • Accounts for temporal artifacts and motion

  • Provides frame-level granularity for detailed analysis

  • Industry-standard metric used by major streaming platforms

SSIM: Structural Similarity Assessment

SSIM measures structural information preservation by comparing luminance, contrast, and structure between reference and distorted images. (AI Video Enhancement and Upscaling) Unlike pixel-based metrics, SSIM aligns better with human visual system characteristics, making it particularly valuable for evaluating AI upscaling and enhancement algorithms.

Setting Up Your Benchmarking Environment

Compiling FFmpeg with libvmaf Support

Most standard FFmpeg builds lack VMAF support, requiring a custom compilation with libvmaf enabled. Here's the complete setup process:

Prerequisites:

# Install build dependencies (Ubuntu/Debian)sudo apt updatesudo apt install build-essential cmake git pkg-configsudo apt install nasm yasm libx264-dev libx265-dev libvpx-dev

Building libvmaf:

# Clone and build libvmafgit clone https://github.com/Netflix/vmaf.gitcd vmaf/libvmafmkdir build && cd buildcmake .. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Releasemake -j$(nproc)sudo make installsudo ldconfig

Compiling FFmpeg with VMAF:

# Download FFmpeg sourcewget https://ffmpeg.org/releases/ffmpeg-6.1.tar.xztar -xf ffmpeg-6.1.tar.xzcd ffmpeg-6.1# Configure with libvmaf support./configure --enable-libvmaf --enable-libx264 --enable-libx265 \            --enable-libvpx --enable-gpl --enable-version3# Compile (this takes 15-30 minutes)make -j$(nproc)sudo make install

Verifying VMAF Installation

Confirm your FFmpeg build includes VMAF support:

ffmpeg -filters | grep vmaf# Should output: vmaf, libvmaf

Netflix Open Content Dataset Overview

Netflix provides a curated collection of reference content specifically designed for codec and quality evaluation. (Filling the gaps in video transcoder deployment in the cloud) This dataset includes diverse content types with varying motion, texture, and complexity characteristics.

Dataset Categories

Content Type

Description

Use Case

Animation

Cartoon-style content with flat colors

AI upscaling of animated content

Documentary

Real-world footage with natural textures

General-purpose AI enhancement

Sports

High-motion sequences with complex backgrounds

Motion-sensitive AI processing

Drama

Dialogue scenes with skin tones

Portrait-focused AI tools

Nature

Landscapes with fine details

Texture preservation evaluation

Downloading Reference Content

Netflix provides both 4K reference files and pre-encoded versions at various bitrates:

# Create dataset directorymkdir netflix_content && cd netflix_content# Download sample reference fileswget https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/ElFuente_4k.y4mwget https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/Chimera_4k.y4mwget https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/Netflix_Aerial_4k.y4m

Note: For comprehensive testing, Netflix provides additional content through their Technology Blog and GitHub repositories. (Sima Labs)

Running Multi-Metric Analysis in One Pass

The Efficient Approach: Combined PSNR/SSIM/VMAF

Rather than running separate FFmpeg commands for each metric, you can calculate PSNR, SSIM, and VMAF simultaneously using FFmpeg's filter graph capabilities:

ffmpeg -i reference.mp4 -i distorted.mp4 -lavfi \"[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:log_fmt=json:log_path=vmaf_output.json:psnr=1:ssim=1:ms_ssim=1" \-f null

Understanding the Command Parameters

  • libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1: Uses the latest VMAF model

  • log_fmt=json: Outputs structured JSON for easy parsing

  • psnr=1:ssim=1:ms_ssim=1: Enables additional metrics in single pass

  • log_path=vmaf_output.json: Specifies output file location

Batch Processing Multiple Files

For systematic evaluation of AI video tools, create a batch processing script:

#!/bin/bash# batch_vmaf.sh - Process multiple video pairsREF_DIR="reference_videos"TEST_DIR="ai_enhanced_videos"OUTPUT_DIR="vmaf_results"mkdir -p $OUTPUT_DIRfor ref_file in $REF_DIR/*.mp4; do    basename=$(basename "$ref_file" .mp4)    test_file="$TEST_DIR/${basename}_enhanced.mp4"        if [ -f "$test_file" ]; then        echo "Processing: $basename"        ffmpeg -i "$ref_file" -i "$test_file" -lavfi \        "[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:log_fmt=json:log_path=$OUTPUT_DIR/${basename}_vmaf.json:psnr=1:ssim=1:ms_ssim=1" \        -f null - 2>/dev/null    fidone

Advanced VMAF Configuration Options

Model Selection for Different Use Cases

VMAF offers multiple models optimized for specific scenarios. (Deep Render: An AI Codec That Encodes in FFmpeg, Plays in VLC, and Outperforms SVT-AV1) The Deep Render codec, for example, has made aggressive claims about performance improvements, requiring careful model selection for accurate evaluation.

Available VMAF Models:

  • vmaf_v0.6.1: General-purpose model (default)

  • vmaf_4k_v0.6.1: Optimized for 4K content

  • vmaf_mobile_v0.2.1: Mobile viewing conditions

  • vmaf_hdr_v0.4.0: HDR content evaluation

Temporal Pooling Strategies

VMAF provides several methods for aggregating frame-level scores into overall quality metrics:

# Harmonic mean pooling (recommended for streaming)ffmpeg -i ref.mp4 -i test.mp4 -lavfi \"[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:pool=harmonic_mean:log_fmt=json:log_path=output.json" \-f null -# Percentile pooling (useful for identifying worst-case frames)ffmpeg -i ref.mp4 -i test.mp4 -lavfi \"[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:pool=percentile:percentile=10:log_fmt=json:log_path=output.json" \-f null

Harmonic Mean Pooling: Why It Matters

Harmonic mean pooling gives higher weight to lower-quality frames, making it particularly valuable for streaming applications where brief quality drops significantly impact user experience. (Sima Labs) This approach aligns with how viewers perceive quality degradation, where a few poor frames can overshadow many good ones.

Visualizing Results with FFMetrics

Installing FFMetrics

FFMetrics provides powerful visualization capabilities for VMAF and other video quality metrics:

# Install via pippip install ffmetrics# Or install from source for latest featuresgit clone https://github.com/slhck/ffmetrics.gitcd ffmetricspip install -e .

Generating Quality Plots

FFMetrics can parse VMAF JSON output and generate publication-ready plots:

# Basic VMAF plot over timeffmetrics vmaf_output.json --plot# Multi-metric comparisonffmetrics vmaf_output.json --metrics vmaf,psnr,ssim --plot# Export high-resolution plotsffmetrics vmaf_output.json --plot --output vmaf_analysis.png --dpi 300

Customizing Visualizations

For professional presentations, FFMetrics supports extensive customization:

# Python script for custom visualizationimport ffmetricsimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt# Load VMAF datadata = ffmetrics.load_vmaf_json('vmaf_output.json')# Create custom plotfig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(2, 1, figsize=(12, 8))# VMAF over timeax1.plot(data['frame_num'], data['vmaf'], label='VMAF', linewidth=2)ax1.set_ylabel('VMAF Score')ax1.set_title('Video Quality Analysis')ax1.grid(True, alpha=0.3)ax1.legend()# SSIM comparisonax2.plot(data['frame_num'], data['ssim'], label='SSIM', color='orange', linewidth=2)ax2.set_xlabel('Frame Number')ax2.set_ylabel('SSIM Score')ax2.grid(True, alpha=0.3)ax2.legend()plt.tight_layout()plt.savefig('quality_analysis.png', dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')

Benchmarking AI Video Enhancement Tools

Systematic Evaluation Framework

When benchmarking AI video tools, consistency in methodology is crucial. (AI Video Enhancement and Upscaling) AI video enhancement uses machine learning algorithms and neural networks trained on vast datasets to improve video quality, making standardized evaluation essential.

Recommended Test Matrix:

Content Type

Resolution

Bitrate

Duration

AI Tool Settings

Animation

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Default enhancement

Documentary

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Noise reduction + sharpening

Sports

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Motion-optimized

Portrait

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Skin tone preservation

Preprocessing with SimaBit Integration

Sima Labs' SimaBit engine demonstrates how AI preprocessing can improve quality metrics before traditional encoding. (Sima Labs) The patent-filed AI preprocessing engine reduces video bandwidth requirements by 22% or more while boosting perceptual quality, making it an ideal candidate for VMAF evaluation.

SimaBit Evaluation Workflow:

  1. Apply SimaBit preprocessing to reference content

  2. Encode with target codec (H.264, HEVC, AV1)

  3. Compare against direct encoding without preprocessing

  4. Measure VMAF improvement at equivalent bitrates

Comparative Analysis Example

Here's a complete workflow for comparing multiple AI enhancement tools:

#!/bin/bash# compare_ai_tools.sh - Systematic AI tool evaluationREFERENCE="netflix_reference.mp4"TOOLS=("tool_a" "tool_b" "tool_c")OUTPUT_DIR="comparison_results"mkdir -p $OUTPUT_DIRfor tool in "${TOOLS[@]}"; do    echo "Testing $tool..."        # Apply AI enhancement (replace with actual tool commands)    enhance_video.py --input $REFERENCE --output ${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_enhanced.mp4 --tool $tool        # Run VMAF analysis    ffmpeg -i $REFERENCE -i ${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_enhanced.mp4 -lavfi \    "[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:pool=harmonic_mean:log_fmt=json:log_path=${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_vmaf.json:psnr=1:ssim=1" \    -f null - 2>/dev/null        # Extract summary scores    python extract_scores.py ${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_vmaf.json >> ${OUTPUT_DIR}/summary.csvdone# Generate comparison reportpython generate_report.py ${OUTPUT_DIR}/summary.csv

Understanding VMAF Score Interpretation

Score Ranges and Quality Levels

VMAF scores range from 0-100, with higher values indicating better perceptual quality. (Sima Labs) Understanding these ranges helps interpret AI tool performance:

VMAF Range

Quality Level

Typical Use Case

95-100

Excellent

Reference/master quality

80-95

Very Good

High-quality streaming

65-80

Good

Standard streaming

45-65

Fair

Mobile/low-bandwidth

0-45

Poor

Unacceptable quality

Content-Dependent Variations

Different content types exhibit varying VMAF sensitivity. (How AI is Transforming Video Quality) Animation content typically achieves higher VMAF scores due to simpler textures, while complex natural scenes with fine details are more challenging for AI enhancement algorithms.

Statistical Significance Testing

When comparing AI tools, ensure statistical significance by testing multiple content samples:

# Statistical analysis exampleimport numpy as npfrom scipy import stats# VMAF scores from two AI toolstool_a_scores = [78.5, 82.1, 79.3, 81.7, 80.2]tool_b_scores = [76.2, 79.8, 77.1, 79.5, 78.9]# Perform t-testt_stat, p_value = stats.ttest_ind(tool_a_scores, tool_b_scores)print(f"T-statistic: {t_stat:.3f}")print(f"P-value: {p_value:.3f}")print(f"Significant difference: {p_value < 0.05}")

Advanced Benchmarking Techniques

Multi-Resolution Analysis

Modern AI video tools often perform differently across resolutions. (Make Veo 3 & Midjourney Videos 4K 120fps!) Aiarty Video Enhancer and similar tools use advanced diffusion and GAN technology, requiring evaluation at multiple resolutions to understand performance characteristics.

Resolution Test Matrix:

# Test multiple resolutions systematicallyRESOLUTIONS=("720p" "1080p" "1440p" "4k")for res in "${RESOLUTIONS[@]}"; do    # Scale reference content    ffmpeg -i reference_4k.mp4 -vf scale=${res} reference_${res}.mp4        # Apply AI enhancement    ai_enhance --input reference_${res}.mp4 --output enhanced_${res}.mp4        # Measure quality    ffmpeg -i reference_${res}.mp4 -i enhanced_${res}.mp4 -lavfi \    "[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=log_path=vmaf_${res}.json" -f null -done

Temporal Consistency Analysis

AI video enhancement can introduce temporal artifacts like flickering or inconsistent processing between frames. (AI-Powered Video Editing Trends in 2025) VMAF's frame-level analysis helps identify these issues:

# Temporal consistency analysisimport jsonimport numpy as npdef analyze_temporal_consistency(vmaf_json_path):    with open(vmaf_json_path, 'r') as f:        data = json.load(f)        # Extract frame-level VMAF scores    scores = [frame['metrics']['vmaf'] for frame in data['frames']]        # Calculate temporal variation metrics    score_diff = np.diff(scores)    temporal_variation = np.std(score_diff)    max_drop = np.min(score_diff)        return {        'temporal_variation': temporal_variation,        'max_quality_drop': max_drop,        'consistency_score': 100 - temporal_variation    }# Analyze multiple AI toolstools = ['tool_a', 'tool_b', 'tool_c']for tool in tools:    consistency = analyze_temporal_consistency(f'{tool}_vmaf.json')    print(f"{tool}: Consistency Score = {consistency['consistency_score']:.2f}")

Content-Adaptive Evaluation

Different AI tools excel with specific content types. (CABR Library) Beamr's CABR rate control library demonstrates content-adaptive approaches, adapting encoding to content at the frame level to ensure highest video quality at lowest bitrate.

Content Classification Framework:

# Automatic content classification for targeted evaluationimport cv2import numpy as npdef classify_content_complexity(video_path):    cap = cv2.VideoCapture(video_path)    complexities = []        while True:        ret, frame = cap.read()        if not ret:            break                    # Calculate spatial complexity (edge density)        gray = cv2.cvtColor(frame, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)        edges = cv2.Canny(gray, 50, 150)        complexity = np.sum(edges > 0) / (frame.shape[0] * frame.shape[1])        complexities.append(complexity)        cap.release()        avg_complexity = np.mean(complexities)        if avg_complexity > 0.15:        return "high_complexity"    elif avg_complexity > 0.08:        return "medium_complexity"    else:        return "low_complexity"# Adaptive evaluation based on contentcontent_type = classify_content_complexity("test_video.mp4")print(f"Content classified as: {content_type}")# Use appropriate evaluation parametersif content_type == "high_complexity":    vmaf_mo## Frequently Asked Questions### What are VMAF and SSIM metrics and why are they important for AI video benchmarking?VMAF (Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion) and SSIM (Structural Similarity Index) are objective video quality metrics that provide standardized ways to measure video quality. VMAF, developed by Netflix, correlates well with human perception and is widely used in streaming, while SSIM measures structural similarity between original and processed videos. These metrics are crucial for AI video benchmarking because they eliminate subjective bias and provide consistent, reproducible quality measurements across different AI video generation tools.### How can Netflix open content be used for benchmarking AI video tools?Netflix open content provides high-quality reference videos with known characteristics that serve as standardized test material for benchmarking. By using the same source content across different AI video tools like Midjourney Video, Runway Gen-3, and Google Veo 3, you can objectively compare their performance using VMAF and SSIM scores. This approach ensures fair comparison since all tools are processing identical input material, making quality differences attributable to the AI algorithms rather than source content variations.### Which AI video generation tools can be benchmarked using this methodology?This benchmarking methodology works with any AI video generation tool, including popular options like Runway's Gen-3 Alpha model, Google Veo 3, and Midjourney Video. The approach is tool-agnostic since it focuses on measuring output quality rather than specific implementation details. Whether you're testing prompt-to-video generation tools or AI video enhancement solutions, VMAF and SSIM metrics provide consistent quality assessment across different platforms and technologies.### How do AI video codecs like Deep Render compare to traditional codecs in benchmarking?AI-based codecs like Deep Render show significant improvements over traditional codecs in benchmarking tests. Deep Render claims a 45% BD-Rate improvement over SVT-AV1 and integrates directly with FFmpeg and VLC for practical deployment. When benchmarking AI video tools, these advanced codecs can affect the final quality scores, making it important to consider the entire pipeline from generation to encoding when conducting comprehensive quality assessments.### What role does bandwidth reduction play in AI video streaming quality assessment?Bandwidth reduction is crucial for streaming applications and directly impacts quality metrics in benchmarking. AI-powered solutions can achieve up to 50% bitrate reduction while maintaining quality, as demonstrated by content-adaptive encoding technologies. When benchmarking AI video tools for streaming applications, it's essential to measure not just raw quality but also compression efficiency, as this affects real-world deployment costs and user experience across different network conditions.### How can content creators choose the best AI video tool based on benchmark results?Content creators should evaluate benchmark results holistically, considering VMAF scores for perceptual quality, SSIM for structural preservation, and practical factors like processing speed and cost. Tools showing consistent high scores across diverse content types from Netflix's open dataset are generally more reliable. Additionally, creators should consider specific use cases - some tools excel at motion generation while others perform better for static scene enhancement, making targeted benchmarking essential for informed decision-making.## Sources1. [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.08634.pdf](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.08634.pdf)2. [https://beamr.com/cabr_library](https://beamr.com/cabr_library)3. [https://medium.com/@vidio-ai/ai-powered-video-editing-trends-in-2025-54461f5d17e2](https://medium.com/@vidio-ai/ai-powered-video-editing-trends-in-2025-54461f5d17e2)4. [https://project-aeon.com/blogs/how-ai-is-transforming-video-quality-enhance-upscale-and-restore](https://project-aeon.com/blogs/how-ai-is-transforming-video-quality-enhance-upscale-and-restore)5. [https://streaminglearningcenter.com/codecs/deep-render-an-ai-codec-that-encodes-in-ffmpeg-plays-in-vlc-and-outperforms-svt-av1.html](https://streaminglearningcenter.com/codecs/deep-render-an-ai-codec-that-encodes-in-ffmpeg-plays-in-vlc-and-outperforms-svt-av1.html)6. [https://tensorpix.ai/blog/ai-video-enhancement-and-upscaling-all-you-need-to-know](https://tensorpix.ai/blog/ai-video-enhancement-and-upscaling-all-you-need-to-know)7. [https://www.sima.live/blog/understanding-bandwidth-reduction-for-streaming-with-ai-video-codec](https://www.sima.live/blog/understanding-bandwidth-reduction-for-streaming-with-ai-video-codec)8. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05L-W1-Ub9E](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05L-W1-Ub9E)

Lab Guide: Benchmarking Any AI Video Tool with VMAF & SSIM Using Netflix Open Content

Introduction

As AI video generation tools like Midjourney Video, Runway Gen-3, and Google Veo 3 flood the market, content creators and streaming platforms face a critical challenge: how do you objectively measure which tool delivers the best quality? (AI-Powered Video Editing Trends in 2025) Traditional subjective evaluation falls short when comparing dozens of AI models, making standardized metrics like VMAF (Video Multi-Method Assessment Fusion) and SSIM (Structural Similarity Index) essential for data-driven decisions.

This comprehensive lab guide walks you through building a complete benchmarking pipeline using FFmpeg with libvmaf, Netflix's open content dataset, and FFMetrics visualization. (Deep Render: An AI Codec That Encodes in FFmpeg, Plays in VLC, and Outperforms SVT-AV1) Whether you're evaluating AI upscaling tools, comparing codec performance, or validating preprocessing engines like Sima Labs' SimaBit, this methodology provides the scientific rigor needed for professional video workflows.

Why VMAF and SSIM Matter for AI Video Evaluation

The Limitations of Subjective Testing

While human perception remains the gold standard for video quality assessment, subjective testing becomes impractical when evaluating multiple AI video tools across diverse content types. (How AI is Transforming Video Quality) Modern AI video enhancement relies on deep learning models trained on large video datasets to recognize patterns and textures, making their output highly variable depending on content characteristics.

VMAF: Netflix's Perceptual Quality Metric

VMAF combines multiple elementary metrics (PSNR, SSIM, MS-SSIM) with machine learning to predict human perception scores. (Sima Labs) Developed by Netflix and validated against thousands of subjective tests, VMAF scores correlate strongly with Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) across diverse content types and viewing conditions.

Key VMAF advantages:

  • Trained on Netflix's massive subjective database

  • Accounts for temporal artifacts and motion

  • Provides frame-level granularity for detailed analysis

  • Industry-standard metric used by major streaming platforms

SSIM: Structural Similarity Assessment

SSIM measures structural information preservation by comparing luminance, contrast, and structure between reference and distorted images. (AI Video Enhancement and Upscaling) Unlike pixel-based metrics, SSIM aligns better with human visual system characteristics, making it particularly valuable for evaluating AI upscaling and enhancement algorithms.

Setting Up Your Benchmarking Environment

Compiling FFmpeg with libvmaf Support

Most standard FFmpeg builds lack VMAF support, requiring a custom compilation with libvmaf enabled. Here's the complete setup process:

Prerequisites:

# Install build dependencies (Ubuntu/Debian)sudo apt updatesudo apt install build-essential cmake git pkg-configsudo apt install nasm yasm libx264-dev libx265-dev libvpx-dev

Building libvmaf:

# Clone and build libvmafgit clone https://github.com/Netflix/vmaf.gitcd vmaf/libvmafmkdir build && cd buildcmake .. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Releasemake -j$(nproc)sudo make installsudo ldconfig

Compiling FFmpeg with VMAF:

# Download FFmpeg sourcewget https://ffmpeg.org/releases/ffmpeg-6.1.tar.xztar -xf ffmpeg-6.1.tar.xzcd ffmpeg-6.1# Configure with libvmaf support./configure --enable-libvmaf --enable-libx264 --enable-libx265 \            --enable-libvpx --enable-gpl --enable-version3# Compile (this takes 15-30 minutes)make -j$(nproc)sudo make install

Verifying VMAF Installation

Confirm your FFmpeg build includes VMAF support:

ffmpeg -filters | grep vmaf# Should output: vmaf, libvmaf

Netflix Open Content Dataset Overview

Netflix provides a curated collection of reference content specifically designed for codec and quality evaluation. (Filling the gaps in video transcoder deployment in the cloud) This dataset includes diverse content types with varying motion, texture, and complexity characteristics.

Dataset Categories

Content Type

Description

Use Case

Animation

Cartoon-style content with flat colors

AI upscaling of animated content

Documentary

Real-world footage with natural textures

General-purpose AI enhancement

Sports

High-motion sequences with complex backgrounds

Motion-sensitive AI processing

Drama

Dialogue scenes with skin tones

Portrait-focused AI tools

Nature

Landscapes with fine details

Texture preservation evaluation

Downloading Reference Content

Netflix provides both 4K reference files and pre-encoded versions at various bitrates:

# Create dataset directorymkdir netflix_content && cd netflix_content# Download sample reference fileswget https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/ElFuente_4k.y4mwget https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/Chimera_4k.y4mwget https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/Netflix_Aerial_4k.y4m

Note: For comprehensive testing, Netflix provides additional content through their Technology Blog and GitHub repositories. (Sima Labs)

Running Multi-Metric Analysis in One Pass

The Efficient Approach: Combined PSNR/SSIM/VMAF

Rather than running separate FFmpeg commands for each metric, you can calculate PSNR, SSIM, and VMAF simultaneously using FFmpeg's filter graph capabilities:

ffmpeg -i reference.mp4 -i distorted.mp4 -lavfi \"[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:log_fmt=json:log_path=vmaf_output.json:psnr=1:ssim=1:ms_ssim=1" \-f null

Understanding the Command Parameters

  • libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1: Uses the latest VMAF model

  • log_fmt=json: Outputs structured JSON for easy parsing

  • psnr=1:ssim=1:ms_ssim=1: Enables additional metrics in single pass

  • log_path=vmaf_output.json: Specifies output file location

Batch Processing Multiple Files

For systematic evaluation of AI video tools, create a batch processing script:

#!/bin/bash# batch_vmaf.sh - Process multiple video pairsREF_DIR="reference_videos"TEST_DIR="ai_enhanced_videos"OUTPUT_DIR="vmaf_results"mkdir -p $OUTPUT_DIRfor ref_file in $REF_DIR/*.mp4; do    basename=$(basename "$ref_file" .mp4)    test_file="$TEST_DIR/${basename}_enhanced.mp4"        if [ -f "$test_file" ]; then        echo "Processing: $basename"        ffmpeg -i "$ref_file" -i "$test_file" -lavfi \        "[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:log_fmt=json:log_path=$OUTPUT_DIR/${basename}_vmaf.json:psnr=1:ssim=1:ms_ssim=1" \        -f null - 2>/dev/null    fidone

Advanced VMAF Configuration Options

Model Selection for Different Use Cases

VMAF offers multiple models optimized for specific scenarios. (Deep Render: An AI Codec That Encodes in FFmpeg, Plays in VLC, and Outperforms SVT-AV1) The Deep Render codec, for example, has made aggressive claims about performance improvements, requiring careful model selection for accurate evaluation.

Available VMAF Models:

  • vmaf_v0.6.1: General-purpose model (default)

  • vmaf_4k_v0.6.1: Optimized for 4K content

  • vmaf_mobile_v0.2.1: Mobile viewing conditions

  • vmaf_hdr_v0.4.0: HDR content evaluation

Temporal Pooling Strategies

VMAF provides several methods for aggregating frame-level scores into overall quality metrics:

# Harmonic mean pooling (recommended for streaming)ffmpeg -i ref.mp4 -i test.mp4 -lavfi \"[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:pool=harmonic_mean:log_fmt=json:log_path=output.json" \-f null -# Percentile pooling (useful for identifying worst-case frames)ffmpeg -i ref.mp4 -i test.mp4 -lavfi \"[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:pool=percentile:percentile=10:log_fmt=json:log_path=output.json" \-f null

Harmonic Mean Pooling: Why It Matters

Harmonic mean pooling gives higher weight to lower-quality frames, making it particularly valuable for streaming applications where brief quality drops significantly impact user experience. (Sima Labs) This approach aligns with how viewers perceive quality degradation, where a few poor frames can overshadow many good ones.

Visualizing Results with FFMetrics

Installing FFMetrics

FFMetrics provides powerful visualization capabilities for VMAF and other video quality metrics:

# Install via pippip install ffmetrics# Or install from source for latest featuresgit clone https://github.com/slhck/ffmetrics.gitcd ffmetricspip install -e .

Generating Quality Plots

FFMetrics can parse VMAF JSON output and generate publication-ready plots:

# Basic VMAF plot over timeffmetrics vmaf_output.json --plot# Multi-metric comparisonffmetrics vmaf_output.json --metrics vmaf,psnr,ssim --plot# Export high-resolution plotsffmetrics vmaf_output.json --plot --output vmaf_analysis.png --dpi 300

Customizing Visualizations

For professional presentations, FFMetrics supports extensive customization:

# Python script for custom visualizationimport ffmetricsimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt# Load VMAF datadata = ffmetrics.load_vmaf_json('vmaf_output.json')# Create custom plotfig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(2, 1, figsize=(12, 8))# VMAF over timeax1.plot(data['frame_num'], data['vmaf'], label='VMAF', linewidth=2)ax1.set_ylabel('VMAF Score')ax1.set_title('Video Quality Analysis')ax1.grid(True, alpha=0.3)ax1.legend()# SSIM comparisonax2.plot(data['frame_num'], data['ssim'], label='SSIM', color='orange', linewidth=2)ax2.set_xlabel('Frame Number')ax2.set_ylabel('SSIM Score')ax2.grid(True, alpha=0.3)ax2.legend()plt.tight_layout()plt.savefig('quality_analysis.png', dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')

Benchmarking AI Video Enhancement Tools

Systematic Evaluation Framework

When benchmarking AI video tools, consistency in methodology is crucial. (AI Video Enhancement and Upscaling) AI video enhancement uses machine learning algorithms and neural networks trained on vast datasets to improve video quality, making standardized evaluation essential.

Recommended Test Matrix:

Content Type

Resolution

Bitrate

Duration

AI Tool Settings

Animation

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Default enhancement

Documentary

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Noise reduction + sharpening

Sports

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Motion-optimized

Portrait

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Skin tone preservation

Preprocessing with SimaBit Integration

Sima Labs' SimaBit engine demonstrates how AI preprocessing can improve quality metrics before traditional encoding. (Sima Labs) The patent-filed AI preprocessing engine reduces video bandwidth requirements by 22% or more while boosting perceptual quality, making it an ideal candidate for VMAF evaluation.

SimaBit Evaluation Workflow:

  1. Apply SimaBit preprocessing to reference content

  2. Encode with target codec (H.264, HEVC, AV1)

  3. Compare against direct encoding without preprocessing

  4. Measure VMAF improvement at equivalent bitrates

Comparative Analysis Example

Here's a complete workflow for comparing multiple AI enhancement tools:

#!/bin/bash# compare_ai_tools.sh - Systematic AI tool evaluationREFERENCE="netflix_reference.mp4"TOOLS=("tool_a" "tool_b" "tool_c")OUTPUT_DIR="comparison_results"mkdir -p $OUTPUT_DIRfor tool in "${TOOLS[@]}"; do    echo "Testing $tool..."        # Apply AI enhancement (replace with actual tool commands)    enhance_video.py --input $REFERENCE --output ${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_enhanced.mp4 --tool $tool        # Run VMAF analysis    ffmpeg -i $REFERENCE -i ${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_enhanced.mp4 -lavfi \    "[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:pool=harmonic_mean:log_fmt=json:log_path=${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_vmaf.json:psnr=1:ssim=1" \    -f null - 2>/dev/null        # Extract summary scores    python extract_scores.py ${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_vmaf.json >> ${OUTPUT_DIR}/summary.csvdone# Generate comparison reportpython generate_report.py ${OUTPUT_DIR}/summary.csv

Understanding VMAF Score Interpretation

Score Ranges and Quality Levels

VMAF scores range from 0-100, with higher values indicating better perceptual quality. (Sima Labs) Understanding these ranges helps interpret AI tool performance:

VMAF Range

Quality Level

Typical Use Case

95-100

Excellent

Reference/master quality

80-95

Very Good

High-quality streaming

65-80

Good

Standard streaming

45-65

Fair

Mobile/low-bandwidth

0-45

Poor

Unacceptable quality

Content-Dependent Variations

Different content types exhibit varying VMAF sensitivity. (How AI is Transforming Video Quality) Animation content typically achieves higher VMAF scores due to simpler textures, while complex natural scenes with fine details are more challenging for AI enhancement algorithms.

Statistical Significance Testing

When comparing AI tools, ensure statistical significance by testing multiple content samples:

# Statistical analysis exampleimport numpy as npfrom scipy import stats# VMAF scores from two AI toolstool_a_scores = [78.5, 82.1, 79.3, 81.7, 80.2]tool_b_scores = [76.2, 79.8, 77.1, 79.5, 78.9]# Perform t-testt_stat, p_value = stats.ttest_ind(tool_a_scores, tool_b_scores)print(f"T-statistic: {t_stat:.3f}")print(f"P-value: {p_value:.3f}")print(f"Significant difference: {p_value < 0.05}")

Advanced Benchmarking Techniques

Multi-Resolution Analysis

Modern AI video tools often perform differently across resolutions. (Make Veo 3 & Midjourney Videos 4K 120fps!) Aiarty Video Enhancer and similar tools use advanced diffusion and GAN technology, requiring evaluation at multiple resolutions to understand performance characteristics.

Resolution Test Matrix:

# Test multiple resolutions systematicallyRESOLUTIONS=("720p" "1080p" "1440p" "4k")for res in "${RESOLUTIONS[@]}"; do    # Scale reference content    ffmpeg -i reference_4k.mp4 -vf scale=${res} reference_${res}.mp4        # Apply AI enhancement    ai_enhance --input reference_${res}.mp4 --output enhanced_${res}.mp4        # Measure quality    ffmpeg -i reference_${res}.mp4 -i enhanced_${res}.mp4 -lavfi \    "[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=log_path=vmaf_${res}.json" -f null -done

Temporal Consistency Analysis

AI video enhancement can introduce temporal artifacts like flickering or inconsistent processing between frames. (AI-Powered Video Editing Trends in 2025) VMAF's frame-level analysis helps identify these issues:

# Temporal consistency analysisimport jsonimport numpy as npdef analyze_temporal_consistency(vmaf_json_path):    with open(vmaf_json_path, 'r') as f:        data = json.load(f)        # Extract frame-level VMAF scores    scores = [frame['metrics']['vmaf'] for frame in data['frames']]        # Calculate temporal variation metrics    score_diff = np.diff(scores)    temporal_variation = np.std(score_diff)    max_drop = np.min(score_diff)        return {        'temporal_variation': temporal_variation,        'max_quality_drop': max_drop,        'consistency_score': 100 - temporal_variation    }# Analyze multiple AI toolstools = ['tool_a', 'tool_b', 'tool_c']for tool in tools:    consistency = analyze_temporal_consistency(f'{tool}_vmaf.json')    print(f"{tool}: Consistency Score = {consistency['consistency_score']:.2f}")

Content-Adaptive Evaluation

Different AI tools excel with specific content types. (CABR Library) Beamr's CABR rate control library demonstrates content-adaptive approaches, adapting encoding to content at the frame level to ensure highest video quality at lowest bitrate.

Content Classification Framework:

# Automatic content classification for targeted evaluationimport cv2import numpy as npdef classify_content_complexity(video_path):    cap = cv2.VideoCapture(video_path)    complexities = []        while True:        ret, frame = cap.read()        if not ret:            break                    # Calculate spatial complexity (edge density)        gray = cv2.cvtColor(frame, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)        edges = cv2.Canny(gray, 50, 150)        complexity = np.sum(edges > 0) / (frame.shape[0] * frame.shape[1])        complexities.append(complexity)        cap.release()        avg_complexity = np.mean(complexities)        if avg_complexity > 0.15:        return "high_complexity"    elif avg_complexity > 0.08:        return "medium_complexity"    else:        return "low_complexity"# Adaptive evaluation based on contentcontent_type = classify_content_complexity("test_video.mp4")print(f"Content classified as: {content_type}")# Use appropriate evaluation parametersif content_type == "high_complexity":    vmaf_mo## Frequently Asked Questions### What are VMAF and SSIM metrics and why are they important for AI video benchmarking?VMAF (Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion) and SSIM (Structural Similarity Index) are objective video quality metrics that provide standardized ways to measure video quality. VMAF, developed by Netflix, correlates well with human perception and is widely used in streaming, while SSIM measures structural similarity between original and processed videos. These metrics are crucial for AI video benchmarking because they eliminate subjective bias and provide consistent, reproducible quality measurements across different AI video generation tools.### How can Netflix open content be used for benchmarking AI video tools?Netflix open content provides high-quality reference videos with known characteristics that serve as standardized test material for benchmarking. By using the same source content across different AI video tools like Midjourney Video, Runway Gen-3, and Google Veo 3, you can objectively compare their performance using VMAF and SSIM scores. This approach ensures fair comparison since all tools are processing identical input material, making quality differences attributable to the AI algorithms rather than source content variations.### Which AI video generation tools can be benchmarked using this methodology?This benchmarking methodology works with any AI video generation tool, including popular options like Runway's Gen-3 Alpha model, Google Veo 3, and Midjourney Video. The approach is tool-agnostic since it focuses on measuring output quality rather than specific implementation details. Whether you're testing prompt-to-video generation tools or AI video enhancement solutions, VMAF and SSIM metrics provide consistent quality assessment across different platforms and technologies.### How do AI video codecs like Deep Render compare to traditional codecs in benchmarking?AI-based codecs like Deep Render show significant improvements over traditional codecs in benchmarking tests. Deep Render claims a 45% BD-Rate improvement over SVT-AV1 and integrates directly with FFmpeg and VLC for practical deployment. When benchmarking AI video tools, these advanced codecs can affect the final quality scores, making it important to consider the entire pipeline from generation to encoding when conducting comprehensive quality assessments.### What role does bandwidth reduction play in AI video streaming quality assessment?Bandwidth reduction is crucial for streaming applications and directly impacts quality metrics in benchmarking. AI-powered solutions can achieve up to 50% bitrate reduction while maintaining quality, as demonstrated by content-adaptive encoding technologies. When benchmarking AI video tools for streaming applications, it's essential to measure not just raw quality but also compression efficiency, as this affects real-world deployment costs and user experience across different network conditions.### How can content creators choose the best AI video tool based on benchmark results?Content creators should evaluate benchmark results holistically, considering VMAF scores for perceptual quality, SSIM for structural preservation, and practical factors like processing speed and cost. Tools showing consistent high scores across diverse content types from Netflix's open dataset are generally more reliable. Additionally, creators should consider specific use cases - some tools excel at motion generation while others perform better for static scene enhancement, making targeted benchmarking essential for informed decision-making.## Sources1. [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.08634.pdf](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.08634.pdf)2. [https://beamr.com/cabr_library](https://beamr.com/cabr_library)3. [https://medium.com/@vidio-ai/ai-powered-video-editing-trends-in-2025-54461f5d17e2](https://medium.com/@vidio-ai/ai-powered-video-editing-trends-in-2025-54461f5d17e2)4. [https://project-aeon.com/blogs/how-ai-is-transforming-video-quality-enhance-upscale-and-restore](https://project-aeon.com/blogs/how-ai-is-transforming-video-quality-enhance-upscale-and-restore)5. [https://streaminglearningcenter.com/codecs/deep-render-an-ai-codec-that-encodes-in-ffmpeg-plays-in-vlc-and-outperforms-svt-av1.html](https://streaminglearningcenter.com/codecs/deep-render-an-ai-codec-that-encodes-in-ffmpeg-plays-in-vlc-and-outperforms-svt-av1.html)6. [https://tensorpix.ai/blog/ai-video-enhancement-and-upscaling-all-you-need-to-know](https://tensorpix.ai/blog/ai-video-enhancement-and-upscaling-all-you-need-to-know)7. [https://www.sima.live/blog/understanding-bandwidth-reduction-for-streaming-with-ai-video-codec](https://www.sima.live/blog/understanding-bandwidth-reduction-for-streaming-with-ai-video-codec)8. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05L-W1-Ub9E](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05L-W1-Ub9E)

Lab Guide: Benchmarking Any AI Video Tool with VMAF & SSIM Using Netflix Open Content

Introduction

As AI video generation tools like Midjourney Video, Runway Gen-3, and Google Veo 3 flood the market, content creators and streaming platforms face a critical challenge: how do you objectively measure which tool delivers the best quality? (AI-Powered Video Editing Trends in 2025) Traditional subjective evaluation falls short when comparing dozens of AI models, making standardized metrics like VMAF (Video Multi-Method Assessment Fusion) and SSIM (Structural Similarity Index) essential for data-driven decisions.

This comprehensive lab guide walks you through building a complete benchmarking pipeline using FFmpeg with libvmaf, Netflix's open content dataset, and FFMetrics visualization. (Deep Render: An AI Codec That Encodes in FFmpeg, Plays in VLC, and Outperforms SVT-AV1) Whether you're evaluating AI upscaling tools, comparing codec performance, or validating preprocessing engines like Sima Labs' SimaBit, this methodology provides the scientific rigor needed for professional video workflows.

Why VMAF and SSIM Matter for AI Video Evaluation

The Limitations of Subjective Testing

While human perception remains the gold standard for video quality assessment, subjective testing becomes impractical when evaluating multiple AI video tools across diverse content types. (How AI is Transforming Video Quality) Modern AI video enhancement relies on deep learning models trained on large video datasets to recognize patterns and textures, making their output highly variable depending on content characteristics.

VMAF: Netflix's Perceptual Quality Metric

VMAF combines multiple elementary metrics (PSNR, SSIM, MS-SSIM) with machine learning to predict human perception scores. (Sima Labs) Developed by Netflix and validated against thousands of subjective tests, VMAF scores correlate strongly with Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) across diverse content types and viewing conditions.

Key VMAF advantages:

  • Trained on Netflix's massive subjective database

  • Accounts for temporal artifacts and motion

  • Provides frame-level granularity for detailed analysis

  • Industry-standard metric used by major streaming platforms

SSIM: Structural Similarity Assessment

SSIM measures structural information preservation by comparing luminance, contrast, and structure between reference and distorted images. (AI Video Enhancement and Upscaling) Unlike pixel-based metrics, SSIM aligns better with human visual system characteristics, making it particularly valuable for evaluating AI upscaling and enhancement algorithms.

Setting Up Your Benchmarking Environment

Compiling FFmpeg with libvmaf Support

Most standard FFmpeg builds lack VMAF support, requiring a custom compilation with libvmaf enabled. Here's the complete setup process:

Prerequisites:

# Install build dependencies (Ubuntu/Debian)sudo apt updatesudo apt install build-essential cmake git pkg-configsudo apt install nasm yasm libx264-dev libx265-dev libvpx-dev

Building libvmaf:

# Clone and build libvmafgit clone https://github.com/Netflix/vmaf.gitcd vmaf/libvmafmkdir build && cd buildcmake .. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Releasemake -j$(nproc)sudo make installsudo ldconfig

Compiling FFmpeg with VMAF:

# Download FFmpeg sourcewget https://ffmpeg.org/releases/ffmpeg-6.1.tar.xztar -xf ffmpeg-6.1.tar.xzcd ffmpeg-6.1# Configure with libvmaf support./configure --enable-libvmaf --enable-libx264 --enable-libx265 \            --enable-libvpx --enable-gpl --enable-version3# Compile (this takes 15-30 minutes)make -j$(nproc)sudo make install

Verifying VMAF Installation

Confirm your FFmpeg build includes VMAF support:

ffmpeg -filters | grep vmaf# Should output: vmaf, libvmaf

Netflix Open Content Dataset Overview

Netflix provides a curated collection of reference content specifically designed for codec and quality evaluation. (Filling the gaps in video transcoder deployment in the cloud) This dataset includes diverse content types with varying motion, texture, and complexity characteristics.

Dataset Categories

Content Type

Description

Use Case

Animation

Cartoon-style content with flat colors

AI upscaling of animated content

Documentary

Real-world footage with natural textures

General-purpose AI enhancement

Sports

High-motion sequences with complex backgrounds

Motion-sensitive AI processing

Drama

Dialogue scenes with skin tones

Portrait-focused AI tools

Nature

Landscapes with fine details

Texture preservation evaluation

Downloading Reference Content

Netflix provides both 4K reference files and pre-encoded versions at various bitrates:

# Create dataset directorymkdir netflix_content && cd netflix_content# Download sample reference fileswget https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/ElFuente_4k.y4mwget https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/Chimera_4k.y4mwget https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/Netflix_Aerial_4k.y4m

Note: For comprehensive testing, Netflix provides additional content through their Technology Blog and GitHub repositories. (Sima Labs)

Running Multi-Metric Analysis in One Pass

The Efficient Approach: Combined PSNR/SSIM/VMAF

Rather than running separate FFmpeg commands for each metric, you can calculate PSNR, SSIM, and VMAF simultaneously using FFmpeg's filter graph capabilities:

ffmpeg -i reference.mp4 -i distorted.mp4 -lavfi \"[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:log_fmt=json:log_path=vmaf_output.json:psnr=1:ssim=1:ms_ssim=1" \-f null

Understanding the Command Parameters

  • libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1: Uses the latest VMAF model

  • log_fmt=json: Outputs structured JSON for easy parsing

  • psnr=1:ssim=1:ms_ssim=1: Enables additional metrics in single pass

  • log_path=vmaf_output.json: Specifies output file location

Batch Processing Multiple Files

For systematic evaluation of AI video tools, create a batch processing script:

#!/bin/bash# batch_vmaf.sh - Process multiple video pairsREF_DIR="reference_videos"TEST_DIR="ai_enhanced_videos"OUTPUT_DIR="vmaf_results"mkdir -p $OUTPUT_DIRfor ref_file in $REF_DIR/*.mp4; do    basename=$(basename "$ref_file" .mp4)    test_file="$TEST_DIR/${basename}_enhanced.mp4"        if [ -f "$test_file" ]; then        echo "Processing: $basename"        ffmpeg -i "$ref_file" -i "$test_file" -lavfi \        "[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:log_fmt=json:log_path=$OUTPUT_DIR/${basename}_vmaf.json:psnr=1:ssim=1:ms_ssim=1" \        -f null - 2>/dev/null    fidone

Advanced VMAF Configuration Options

Model Selection for Different Use Cases

VMAF offers multiple models optimized for specific scenarios. (Deep Render: An AI Codec That Encodes in FFmpeg, Plays in VLC, and Outperforms SVT-AV1) The Deep Render codec, for example, has made aggressive claims about performance improvements, requiring careful model selection for accurate evaluation.

Available VMAF Models:

  • vmaf_v0.6.1: General-purpose model (default)

  • vmaf_4k_v0.6.1: Optimized for 4K content

  • vmaf_mobile_v0.2.1: Mobile viewing conditions

  • vmaf_hdr_v0.4.0: HDR content evaluation

Temporal Pooling Strategies

VMAF provides several methods for aggregating frame-level scores into overall quality metrics:

# Harmonic mean pooling (recommended for streaming)ffmpeg -i ref.mp4 -i test.mp4 -lavfi \"[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:pool=harmonic_mean:log_fmt=json:log_path=output.json" \-f null -# Percentile pooling (useful for identifying worst-case frames)ffmpeg -i ref.mp4 -i test.mp4 -lavfi \"[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:pool=percentile:percentile=10:log_fmt=json:log_path=output.json" \-f null

Harmonic Mean Pooling: Why It Matters

Harmonic mean pooling gives higher weight to lower-quality frames, making it particularly valuable for streaming applications where brief quality drops significantly impact user experience. (Sima Labs) This approach aligns with how viewers perceive quality degradation, where a few poor frames can overshadow many good ones.

Visualizing Results with FFMetrics

Installing FFMetrics

FFMetrics provides powerful visualization capabilities for VMAF and other video quality metrics:

# Install via pippip install ffmetrics# Or install from source for latest featuresgit clone https://github.com/slhck/ffmetrics.gitcd ffmetricspip install -e .

Generating Quality Plots

FFMetrics can parse VMAF JSON output and generate publication-ready plots:

# Basic VMAF plot over timeffmetrics vmaf_output.json --plot# Multi-metric comparisonffmetrics vmaf_output.json --metrics vmaf,psnr,ssim --plot# Export high-resolution plotsffmetrics vmaf_output.json --plot --output vmaf_analysis.png --dpi 300

Customizing Visualizations

For professional presentations, FFMetrics supports extensive customization:

# Python script for custom visualizationimport ffmetricsimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt# Load VMAF datadata = ffmetrics.load_vmaf_json('vmaf_output.json')# Create custom plotfig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(2, 1, figsize=(12, 8))# VMAF over timeax1.plot(data['frame_num'], data['vmaf'], label='VMAF', linewidth=2)ax1.set_ylabel('VMAF Score')ax1.set_title('Video Quality Analysis')ax1.grid(True, alpha=0.3)ax1.legend()# SSIM comparisonax2.plot(data['frame_num'], data['ssim'], label='SSIM', color='orange', linewidth=2)ax2.set_xlabel('Frame Number')ax2.set_ylabel('SSIM Score')ax2.grid(True, alpha=0.3)ax2.legend()plt.tight_layout()plt.savefig('quality_analysis.png', dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')

Benchmarking AI Video Enhancement Tools

Systematic Evaluation Framework

When benchmarking AI video tools, consistency in methodology is crucial. (AI Video Enhancement and Upscaling) AI video enhancement uses machine learning algorithms and neural networks trained on vast datasets to improve video quality, making standardized evaluation essential.

Recommended Test Matrix:

Content Type

Resolution

Bitrate

Duration

AI Tool Settings

Animation

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Default enhancement

Documentary

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Noise reduction + sharpening

Sports

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Motion-optimized

Portrait

1080p

2 Mbps

30s

Skin tone preservation

Preprocessing with SimaBit Integration

Sima Labs' SimaBit engine demonstrates how AI preprocessing can improve quality metrics before traditional encoding. (Sima Labs) The patent-filed AI preprocessing engine reduces video bandwidth requirements by 22% or more while boosting perceptual quality, making it an ideal candidate for VMAF evaluation.

SimaBit Evaluation Workflow:

  1. Apply SimaBit preprocessing to reference content

  2. Encode with target codec (H.264, HEVC, AV1)

  3. Compare against direct encoding without preprocessing

  4. Measure VMAF improvement at equivalent bitrates

Comparative Analysis Example

Here's a complete workflow for comparing multiple AI enhancement tools:

#!/bin/bash# compare_ai_tools.sh - Systematic AI tool evaluationREFERENCE="netflix_reference.mp4"TOOLS=("tool_a" "tool_b" "tool_c")OUTPUT_DIR="comparison_results"mkdir -p $OUTPUT_DIRfor tool in "${TOOLS[@]}"; do    echo "Testing $tool..."        # Apply AI enhancement (replace with actual tool commands)    enhance_video.py --input $REFERENCE --output ${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_enhanced.mp4 --tool $tool        # Run VMAF analysis    ffmpeg -i $REFERENCE -i ${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_enhanced.mp4 -lavfi \    "[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=model=version=vmaf_v0.6.1:pool=harmonic_mean:log_fmt=json:log_path=${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_vmaf.json:psnr=1:ssim=1" \    -f null - 2>/dev/null        # Extract summary scores    python extract_scores.py ${OUTPUT_DIR}/${tool}_vmaf.json >> ${OUTPUT_DIR}/summary.csvdone# Generate comparison reportpython generate_report.py ${OUTPUT_DIR}/summary.csv

Understanding VMAF Score Interpretation

Score Ranges and Quality Levels

VMAF scores range from 0-100, with higher values indicating better perceptual quality. (Sima Labs) Understanding these ranges helps interpret AI tool performance:

VMAF Range

Quality Level

Typical Use Case

95-100

Excellent

Reference/master quality

80-95

Very Good

High-quality streaming

65-80

Good

Standard streaming

45-65

Fair

Mobile/low-bandwidth

0-45

Poor

Unacceptable quality

Content-Dependent Variations

Different content types exhibit varying VMAF sensitivity. (How AI is Transforming Video Quality) Animation content typically achieves higher VMAF scores due to simpler textures, while complex natural scenes with fine details are more challenging for AI enhancement algorithms.

Statistical Significance Testing

When comparing AI tools, ensure statistical significance by testing multiple content samples:

# Statistical analysis exampleimport numpy as npfrom scipy import stats# VMAF scores from two AI toolstool_a_scores = [78.5, 82.1, 79.3, 81.7, 80.2]tool_b_scores = [76.2, 79.8, 77.1, 79.5, 78.9]# Perform t-testt_stat, p_value = stats.ttest_ind(tool_a_scores, tool_b_scores)print(f"T-statistic: {t_stat:.3f}")print(f"P-value: {p_value:.3f}")print(f"Significant difference: {p_value < 0.05}")

Advanced Benchmarking Techniques

Multi-Resolution Analysis

Modern AI video tools often perform differently across resolutions. (Make Veo 3 & Midjourney Videos 4K 120fps!) Aiarty Video Enhancer and similar tools use advanced diffusion and GAN technology, requiring evaluation at multiple resolutions to understand performance characteristics.

Resolution Test Matrix:

# Test multiple resolutions systematicallyRESOLUTIONS=("720p" "1080p" "1440p" "4k")for res in "${RESOLUTIONS[@]}"; do    # Scale reference content    ffmpeg -i reference_4k.mp4 -vf scale=${res} reference_${res}.mp4        # Apply AI enhancement    ai_enhance --input reference_${res}.mp4 --output enhanced_${res}.mp4        # Measure quality    ffmpeg -i reference_${res}.mp4 -i enhanced_${res}.mp4 -lavfi \    "[0:v][1:v]libvmaf=log_path=vmaf_${res}.json" -f null -done

Temporal Consistency Analysis

AI video enhancement can introduce temporal artifacts like flickering or inconsistent processing between frames. (AI-Powered Video Editing Trends in 2025) VMAF's frame-level analysis helps identify these issues:

# Temporal consistency analysisimport jsonimport numpy as npdef analyze_temporal_consistency(vmaf_json_path):    with open(vmaf_json_path, 'r') as f:        data = json.load(f)        # Extract frame-level VMAF scores    scores = [frame['metrics']['vmaf'] for frame in data['frames']]        # Calculate temporal variation metrics    score_diff = np.diff(scores)    temporal_variation = np.std(score_diff)    max_drop = np.min(score_diff)        return {        'temporal_variation': temporal_variation,        'max_quality_drop': max_drop,        'consistency_score': 100 - temporal_variation    }# Analyze multiple AI toolstools = ['tool_a', 'tool_b', 'tool_c']for tool in tools:    consistency = analyze_temporal_consistency(f'{tool}_vmaf.json')    print(f"{tool}: Consistency Score = {consistency['consistency_score']:.2f}")

Content-Adaptive Evaluation

Different AI tools excel with specific content types. (CABR Library) Beamr's CABR rate control library demonstrates content-adaptive approaches, adapting encoding to content at the frame level to ensure highest video quality at lowest bitrate.

Content Classification Framework:

# Automatic content classification for targeted evaluationimport cv2import numpy as npdef classify_content_complexity(video_path):    cap = cv2.VideoCapture(video_path)    complexities = []        while True:        ret, frame = cap.read()        if not ret:            break                    # Calculate spatial complexity (edge density)        gray = cv2.cvtColor(frame, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)        edges = cv2.Canny(gray, 50, 150)        complexity = np.sum(edges > 0) / (frame.shape[0] * frame.shape[1])        complexities.append(complexity)        cap.release()        avg_complexity = np.mean(complexities)        if avg_complexity > 0.15:        return "high_complexity"    elif avg_complexity > 0.08:        return "medium_complexity"    else:        return "low_complexity"# Adaptive evaluation based on contentcontent_type = classify_content_complexity("test_video.mp4")print(f"Content classified as: {content_type}")# Use appropriate evaluation parametersif content_type == "high_complexity":    vmaf_mo## Frequently Asked Questions### What are VMAF and SSIM metrics and why are they important for AI video benchmarking?VMAF (Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion) and SSIM (Structural Similarity Index) are objective video quality metrics that provide standardized ways to measure video quality. VMAF, developed by Netflix, correlates well with human perception and is widely used in streaming, while SSIM measures structural similarity between original and processed videos. These metrics are crucial for AI video benchmarking because they eliminate subjective bias and provide consistent, reproducible quality measurements across different AI video generation tools.### How can Netflix open content be used for benchmarking AI video tools?Netflix open content provides high-quality reference videos with known characteristics that serve as standardized test material for benchmarking. By using the same source content across different AI video tools like Midjourney Video, Runway Gen-3, and Google Veo 3, you can objectively compare their performance using VMAF and SSIM scores. This approach ensures fair comparison since all tools are processing identical input material, making quality differences attributable to the AI algorithms rather than source content variations.### Which AI video generation tools can be benchmarked using this methodology?This benchmarking methodology works with any AI video generation tool, including popular options like Runway's Gen-3 Alpha model, Google Veo 3, and Midjourney Video. The approach is tool-agnostic since it focuses on measuring output quality rather than specific implementation details. Whether you're testing prompt-to-video generation tools or AI video enhancement solutions, VMAF and SSIM metrics provide consistent quality assessment across different platforms and technologies.### How do AI video codecs like Deep Render compare to traditional codecs in benchmarking?AI-based codecs like Deep Render show significant improvements over traditional codecs in benchmarking tests. Deep Render claims a 45% BD-Rate improvement over SVT-AV1 and integrates directly with FFmpeg and VLC for practical deployment. When benchmarking AI video tools, these advanced codecs can affect the final quality scores, making it important to consider the entire pipeline from generation to encoding when conducting comprehensive quality assessments.### What role does bandwidth reduction play in AI video streaming quality assessment?Bandwidth reduction is crucial for streaming applications and directly impacts quality metrics in benchmarking. AI-powered solutions can achieve up to 50% bitrate reduction while maintaining quality, as demonstrated by content-adaptive encoding technologies. When benchmarking AI video tools for streaming applications, it's essential to measure not just raw quality but also compression efficiency, as this affects real-world deployment costs and user experience across different network conditions.### How can content creators choose the best AI video tool based on benchmark results?Content creators should evaluate benchmark results holistically, considering VMAF scores for perceptual quality, SSIM for structural preservation, and practical factors like processing speed and cost. Tools showing consistent high scores across diverse content types from Netflix's open dataset are generally more reliable. Additionally, creators should consider specific use cases - some tools excel at motion generation while others perform better for static scene enhancement, making targeted benchmarking essential for informed decision-making.## Sources1. [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.08634.pdf](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.08634.pdf)2. [https://beamr.com/cabr_library](https://beamr.com/cabr_library)3. [https://medium.com/@vidio-ai/ai-powered-video-editing-trends-in-2025-54461f5d17e2](https://medium.com/@vidio-ai/ai-powered-video-editing-trends-in-2025-54461f5d17e2)4. [https://project-aeon.com/blogs/how-ai-is-transforming-video-quality-enhance-upscale-and-restore](https://project-aeon.com/blogs/how-ai-is-transforming-video-quality-enhance-upscale-and-restore)5. [https://streaminglearningcenter.com/codecs/deep-render-an-ai-codec-that-encodes-in-ffmpeg-plays-in-vlc-and-outperforms-svt-av1.html](https://streaminglearningcenter.com/codecs/deep-render-an-ai-codec-that-encodes-in-ffmpeg-plays-in-vlc-and-outperforms-svt-av1.html)6. [https://tensorpix.ai/blog/ai-video-enhancement-and-upscaling-all-you-need-to-know](https://tensorpix.ai/blog/ai-video-enhancement-and-upscaling-all-you-need-to-know)7. [https://www.sima.live/blog/understanding-bandwidth-reduction-for-streaming-with-ai-video-codec](https://www.sima.live/blog/understanding-bandwidth-reduction-for-streaming-with-ai-video-codec)8. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05L-W1-Ub9E](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05L-W1-Ub9E)

©2025 Sima Labs. All rights reserved

©2025 Sima Labs. All rights reserved

©2025 Sima Labs. All rights reserved